Make the pop up cards. There are 2 methods for this. For one, cut strips of construction paper three inches long and the width of your flowers. Cut as many strips as you have flowers. Take a strip and fold ½” up
Thứ Hai, 20 tháng 3, 2017
8 shows examples of pop-up cards designed using our system
Fig. 8 shows examples of pop-up cards designed using our system. The first
was based on “The Wonderful Wizard of OZ” [2] pop-up book shown in Fig. 8
(a). We designed the piece shown in Fig. 8 (b) on our system in approximately
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Fig. 8. Pop-up cards designed using our system.
2h. Determining the heights and position was easy due to the error detection
mechanism. Fig. 8 (d)-(f) show the templates generated by our system, which
required approximately 2h for assembly in the final form shown in Fig. 8 (c).
Fig. 8 (g) shows another example. This required approximately 2h for the design
and 2.5 h for assembly into the final form shown in Fig. 8 (h). These results show
that our system can handle reasonably complicated pop-up structures.
We also conducted an informal preliminary user study. The test was conducted
using a typical notebook personal computer with a keyboard and a mouse.
We assigned two tasks: create a pop-up card of a building without using our system
(Task 1) and perform the same task using our system (Task 2). Two test
users participated in the study. They first completed Task 1. We then explained
our system to them and had them practice with it for approximately 5 min before
attempting Task 2. After they had finished both tasks, we conducted a brief
interview to receive their feedback.
&_' &`' &a'
EQNNKUKQP
&b' &c'
Fig. 9. User study results. (a) The card produced by the first user in Task 1. (b)
Collision occurs when the object in (a) is closed. (c) The card produced by the first
user in Task 2. (d) The card produced by the second user in Task 1. (e) The card
produced by the second user in Task 2.
The first test user had never created pop-up cards before and had no knowledge
of them. Fig. 9 (a) shows the card created by the first user in Task 1. It
looks good, but it is difficult to close because of the collision shown in Fig. 9 (b).
Fig. 9 (c) shows the card created by the first user in Task 2; it is simple but it
closes correctly. The first user required 30 min to complete Task 1 (15 min for
design and 15 min for construction) but only 20 min to complete Task 2 (10 min
each for design and construction).
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét